DIRECTIVE 070 / FEEDBACK

RATE FROM MEMORY

A manager who knows the employee should not need excessive interference from evidence.

Conduct the annual evaluation using the manager's accumulated impression. Add examples where available and reconstruct the rest from the employee's general reputation. A sufficiently experienced evaluator can convert twelve months of work into one coherent feeling.

Primary: FEEDBACKFAIRNESSPOWER
RATIONALE
Memory-based judgment is faster than maintaining a disciplined evidence system and preserves managerial discretion.
SUCCESS INDICATOR
Ratings feel internally consistent even when employees struggle to connect them to specific work.
COMMON FAILURE
Using multiple relevant observations, structured criteria and evidence sources while recognizing that performance ratings contain substantial rater-specific variance.
STATUS
Canonical / approved

Reconstructed Handbook series.

THE UNFORTUNATE PART

Unfortunately, the research…

Claim

Performance ratings contain large rater-specific components in addition to target performance information; who provides the rating can materially influence the score.

Evidence

Research decomposing multisource performance ratings found substantial idiosyncratic rater variance, challenging the assumption that a rating is a direct readout of a stable underlying performance trait.

Strength: Strong

Sources

The Directive is satire. The research summary is not. Evidence is stated separately and qualified to the underlying literature rather than treated as proof of the joke.