DIRECTIVE 121 / FEEDBACK

SELL THE JOB

Describe the opportunity that might exist. Hire someone for the job that does.

Advertise autonomy, growth, and an inspiring culture. Discuss the permanent constraints, routine overtime, and limited authority only after the candidate accepts. During onboarding, explain that every role involves adjusting expectations.

THE MECHANISM

Misleading recruitment promises followed by normalization of the actual conditions.

Primary: FEEDBACKFAIRNESSWORTH
RATIONALE
Optimistic previews improve applicant conversion and postpone expectation management until withdrawal becomes administratively inconvenient.
SUCCESS INDICATOR
New hires discover important features of the role gradually enough that each one can be described as normal organizational complexity.
COMMON FAILURE
Providing realistic job previews that include material advantages and difficulties before acceptance so candidates can form more accurate expectations.
THE UNFORTUNATE PART

Evidence, with limitations.

Claim

Realistic job previews affect applicant expectations and post-entry outcomes. Meta-analytic evidence links them with more accurate or lower initial expectations, lower turnover and, on average, somewhat higher performance, with effects depending on how and when the preview is delivered.

Evidence

A meta-analysis of 40 realistic-job-preview studies found relationships with recruitment attrition, expectations, affective reactions, performance and turnover, and identified timing and medium as moderators.

Scientific boundary: Realistic job preview studies involve particular recruitment practices; candor does not ensure low turnover or optimal selection.

Sources

These references offer context, not a completed review or a test of this instruction.