DIRECTIVE 134 / FEEDBACK

PUNISH THE ERROR

Make reporting mistakes more dangerous than making them.

React sharply when an employee admits an error and attach a visible consequence to the disclosure. Encourage everyone to be transparent and accountable. When incident reports decline, announce that the quality initiative is working.

THE MECHANISM

Punitive error responses that suppress reporting and organizational learning.

Primary: FEEDBACKPOWERGROWTH
RATIONALE
Punishment produces immediate behavioral salience and allows the organization to demonstrate that mistakes are taken seriously.
SUCCESS INDICATOR
Recorded errors decline faster than anyone can determine whether actual errors declined with them.
COMMON FAILURE
Building an error-management climate that detects, communicates, analyzes and corrects mistakes quickly while maintaining accountability for reckless or repeated behavior.
THE UNFORTUNATE PART

Evidence, with limitations.

Claim

Error-management culture emphasizes communicating about, analyzing and learning from errors rather than merely suppressing them. Research has linked stronger error-management culture with better organizational performance.

Evidence

Two organizational studies in different national contexts found error-management culture positively associated with goal achievement and economic performance, supporting the proposition that how organizations handle errors matters after errors inevitably occur.

Scientific boundary: Error-management culture studies concern learning responses and performance indicators; they do not show every sanction for every error is harmful.

Sources

These references offer context, not a completed review or a test of this instruction.