MZMORALE ZEROthe antithesis of employee engagement
DIRECTIVE 139 / BELONGING

MAKE THEM FIT THE CULTURE

Hire for difference. Train the difference out of them.

Tell candidates their perspectives will enrich the team. After hiring, correct their working style, assumptions, and communication until they conform to existing norms. When they question the culture, add adaptability to their development goals.

THE MECHANISM

Cultural conformity imposed at the expense of employee distinctiveness.

Primary: BELONGINGWORTHGROWTH
RATIONALE
Locating misfit in the employee protects the organization from having to distinguish productive difference from genuine incompatibility.
SUCCESS INDICATOR
Employees learn the culture accurately enough to understand which parts of themselves should become less visible inside it.
COMMON FAILURE
Distinguishing necessary value or job fit from mere similarity and examining whether recurring misfit reflects the person, the role, the supervisor, the group or the organization itself.
THE UNFORTUNATE PART

Evidence, with limitations.

Claim

Fit at work is multidimensional. Meta-analytic evidence links person–organization, person–job, person–group and person–supervisor fit with important attitudes, withdrawal, strain and other outcomes, but these fit types are not interchangeable.

Evidence

A meta-analysis of 172 studies and 836 effect sizes found broadly generalizable relationships between several forms of fit and pre-entry and post-entry criteria, reinforcing that misfit can arise at multiple levels rather than simply from employee deficiency.

Scientific boundary: Person–organization fit is one of several fit constructs; encouraging adaptation to culture is not universally beneficial or harmful.

Sources

These references offer context, not a completed review or a test of this instruction.

PREVIOUS

MAKE STATUS VISIBLE

NEXT

USE THE GRAPEVINE